A diorama in ~ the Nairobi national Museum portrays early on hominids processing video game with tools. Yet which that our ancient ancestors to be the very first to butcher animals?Ninara/Wikimedia Commons

Living humans, all 7.3 billion of us, room classified together Homo londonchinatown.org. That way we room all part of the very same species; ours genus is Homo, definition “man,” and also our varieties is londonchinatown.org, meaning “wise.” Both genetic and fossil proof place the beginning of our types at around 200,000 years earlier in Africa. However when and where go the more quickly members of the genus Homo evolve? and what makes our genus unique compared with other branches top top our family members tree?

The ideal candidate, based upon current evidence, because that the earliest types in ours genus is Homo habilis (meaning “handy man”). This species, i beg your pardon was called from fossils discovered at Olduvai Gorge, in Tanzania, by a research team led by Louis Leakey, was announced in 1964. The team identified the new species based on the specific anatomy of the fossils, consisting of a larger mind and body and also smaller teeth than members that the earlier-known genus Australopithecus. Yet they likewise did other novel as far as naming a types goes—they connected Homo habilis v the beginning of a particular behavior by saying that this types was the machine of the simple Oldowan stone tools found previously in the same sedimentary layer. (These tools—which room basically straightforward stone knives—are made once roundish rocks, referred to as hammerstones, space struck against an ext angular rocks, called cores, come strike off spicy flakes.) Later, in 1981, when cut marks were uncovered on pet fossils at Olduvai Gorge, they were presumed to have actually been produced by Homo habilis wielding these stone tools to butcher large animals. Homo habilis was claimed the toolmaker and the meat eater, and, as a result, a core component of the an interpretation of ours genus associated these 2 novel behaviors.

You are watching: Evidence leading to an interpretation of tool use in h. habilis includes

The species Homo habilis—meaning “handy man”—was long thought to it is in our faster ancestor that made devices to butcher animals for food. Smithsonian’s human Origins Program

This narrative organized for over 3 decades, with the so late 1990s. In 1997, even earlier stone tools—dating come 2.5–2.6 million years old—were reported from the Gona research area in Ethiopia. In the same year, a new Homo habilis fossil upper-jaw fragment native the Hadar site in Ethiopia moved the beginning of this varieties back come 2.34 million year ago. Then, in 1999, 2.5-million-year-old stone-tool reduced marks on animal fossils were reported from the Bouri site in Ethiopia, together with percussion marks made on skeleton when beforehand humans smashed them open up with stones come retrieve the nutritious marrow inside. Even with this brand-new evidence, though, the correlation persisted, and also this package of brand-new traits—larger brains, rock toolmaking, and meat eating—still seemed to arise in ours earliest Homo ancestors approximately 2.3–2.5 million years ago.


Get our newsletter with new stories delivered to her inbox every Friday.

sign me up

But recent finds contradict those links. In 2010, a startling notice was made: 2 bones v stone-tool butchery marks dated to 3.4 million years earlier had been discovered at the Dikika site in Ethiopia, pushing the faster traces that meat eating nearly a million years earlier than previously known. This was likewise far previously than the earliest Homo fossils. Walk this mean Australopithecus can use, and maybe also make, rock tools?

Among other things, critics noted that no rock tools had been uncovered at Dikika. So probably Australopithecus wasn’t actually making tools, but just choose up normally sharp rocks to use as stone knives. However, in might 2015, 3.3-million-year-old stone tools indigenous the Lomekwi 3 site, in Kenya, were announced, pushing back the beginning of rock toolmaking by 700,000 years. Just two month earlier, in march 2015, a 2.8-million-year-old fossil mandible and teeth from the Ledi-Geraru study area, in Ethiopia, had actually pushed the beginning of ours genus back about 500,000 years. These fossils have not been assigned to a particular species of at an early stage Homo, however it is now well embraced that they room the more quickly fossils of our genus.

Researchers discovered reduced marks top top this fossil antelope foot bone from Koobi Fora in Kenya, dating to 1.5 million year ago. Briana Pobiner

The existing evidence points to toolmaking and meat eating arising by 3.3 million year ago, but only a grasp of sites with stone tools and/or butchered animal bones have been found before about 1.8 million year ago. The earliest website with evidence that beforehand humans continuously returned to one location to make stone tools and also butcher animals, a website in Kenya recognized as Kanjera South, is dated to 2.0 million years ago; this appears to be the start of continual butchery activities.

So currently the evidence for making and using devices dates ago to half a million years before the origin of our genus. Do tools virtually certainly helped toolmakers survive. Toolmaking would have facilitated accessibility to a wider range that foods and the capacity to process those foods an ext intensively or efficiently, most likely making them much more palatable and also yielding more calories. In the case of meat and marrow eating, toolmaking would have opened up new sources that food higher in protein, fat, and also calories than many other foods obtainable in african savanna landscapes.

Given this benefits, could stone toolmaking it is in a behavior much more common in ours evolutionary background than us thought, and not something that only arised with our genus? primates use rock tools come crack open nuts and also even make wooden spears come hunt smaller sized primates called bush babies, arguing that the capacity to make and use tools is rooted deep in our evolution history. Still, primates don’t use devices to make various other tools, as early humans did as soon as they created the first stone knives. They likewise don’t eat animals larger than themselves; your favorite prey room colobus monkeys, which are much smaller 보다 they are. The faster butchery marks room on the skeletal of extinct pets that were comparable to today’s wildebeests and zebras, which were much bigger than the Australopithecus individuals having actually them because that dinner.

See more: Dilated Pore Of Winer Histology, Winer Pathology Dilated Pore

So what does every this tell us around the idea that Homo was the first maker of rock tools?

Scientists build hypotheses based on available evidence and then check those hypotheses through gathering extr evidence. The long-standing theory that just our genus was capable of making and/or using stone tools come butcher huge animals seems to have actually been refuted by the recent finds of rock tools in ~ Lomekwi and butchered bones in ~ Dikika—at least for now—since the earliest Homo fossils are half a million year younger than the tools and butchered bones. Perhaps ongoing field study in sediments date to roughly 3.0–3.5 million years ago will rotate up Homo fossils, and then the hypothesis will certainly again be supported. (The absence of Homo fossils from this time period is no necessarily proof of your absence.)

Bernard wood of George Washington University says that “a convincing theory for the origin of Homo remains elusive,” and also argues the Homo habilis should it is in classified neither as Homo or Australopithecus, but in its own genus. A recent review of the advancement of at an early stage Homo says that anatomical, physiological, and behavioral traits long organized to specify our genus did no arise in a single integrated package, however instead arised over around a million years in three distinctive lineages, through some characteristics evolving earlier and some later. In any case, it has come to be clear with much more evidence that the origin of ours genus stays murky, and that Homo may not have been the earliest toolmaker and also meat eater in our household tree.